# Does Topping the Points Table Win the Title?

Source: https://cricketin.org/blog/points-table-leader-vs-champion

[By Karthik Iyengar](/authors/data-editor), Data Editor. [Reviewed by Anjali Deshmukh](/authors/cricket-analyst), Cricket Analyst. Updated 2 Sep 2026 · Sources cited: 2. Editorial policy: https://cricketin.org/editorial-policy

18+ Betting money on cricket carries a direct risk of financial loss, and it can become an addiction. Real-money online gaming is banned across India under the PROG Act 2025, which came into force on 1 May 2026.

If betting is already costing you money you need, or sleep, or people close to you, the free Tele-MANAS helpline is **14416**, and it runs in 20 languages. Our [page on help for gambling harm](/guides/help-for-gambling-harm-india) lists what else exists.

---

We counted 40 complete league tables: the leader won the title 18 times. But the top two have won 34 of 40, and no champion has come from lower than fourth.

No. We counted every complete league table we hold — 40 seasons across eight competitions, 286 team-seasons — and the side that finished the league stage first went on to win the title 18 times out of 40.

- Topping the table wins the trophy 45% of the time. It is closer to a coin toss than a formality.
- But finishing in the top two wins it 85% of the time: 34 of the 40 champions came from first or second place.
- Only six champions came from third or fourth, and **no side in our records has ever won a title from lower than fourth**.
- That is the playoff doing its job. Every format we cover gives the top of the table either a second chance or a bye to the final.

## What 40 seasons actually show

A points table answers one question precisely: who won the most league games. It is often read as answering a second question — who is going to win the tournament — and those are not the same question. Here is the whole record, by the position the champion held when the league stage finished.

| Champion finished | Seasons | Share of 40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1st | 18 | 45% |
| 2nd | 16 | 40% |
| 3rd | 4 | 10% |
| 4th | 2 | 5% |
| 5th or lower | 0 | 0% |

Two numbers stand out and they pull in opposite directions. Topping the table is worth much less than it looks: more often than not, the team that led after the league stage did not lift the trophy. But the table is not noise either — the bottom half of it has never produced a champion in any season we hold.

## The real dividing line is second place

Thirty-four of the 40 champions came from first or second. If you want a single sentence for what a points table predicts, it is not "the leader wins" but "the trophy stays in the top two, and which of the two is close to a coin toss."

The gap between second and third is the sharpest edge in the data. Second place has produced 16 champions; third has produced four. There is no gradual decline down the table — there is a cliff immediately below the top two.

## The six champions who came from further back

These are every exception in our records. All six are worth reading closely, because in most of them the champion was not really as far back as the position suggests.

| Season | Champion | Finished | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| IPL 2016 | Sunrisers Hyderabad | 4th of 8 | Level on 16 points with 2nd and 3rd; separated by net run rate alone |
| IPL 2009/10 | Chennai Super Kings | 3rd of 8 | Level on 14 points with three other clubs |
| PSL 2025 | Lahore Qalandars | 4th of 6 | The lowest finish by a champion in a six-team league |
| WPL 2023/24 | Royal Challengers Bangalore | 3rd of 5 | Five-team league, so third is the middle of the table |
| SA20 2022/23 | Sunrisers Eastern Cape | 3rd of 6 | Won only four of ten league games |
| CPL 2021 | St Kitts and Nevis Patriots | 3rd of 6 | Level on 12 points with both clubs above them — the top three were inseparable |

The 2016 IPL is the clearest illustration of how misleading a raw position can be. Sunrisers Hyderabad finished fourth — but on the same 16 points as the teams in second and third, with only net run rate putting them below both. Meanwhile the side that topped that table, Gujarat Lions, did so on 18 points with a *negative* net run rate of −0.374, the only league leader in our records to finish first while conceding more per over than they scored. The full [2016 IPL table](/tables/ipl-2016) shows the whole picture.

The 2009/10 season is the same story one place higher. Chennai Super Kings finished third on 14 points — level with Royal Challengers Bangalore, Delhi Daredevils and Kolkata Knight Riders, four clubs on the same score, ordered only by net run rate. Chennai won the title from there and went on to become one of the two most successful clubs in the competition, as our [IPL winners list](/blog/ipl-winners-list) sets out.

## Why the playoff protects the top of the table

The 85% figure is not luck. Every format we cover is built to reward a good league stage, and they do it in one of two ways. We read the structures out of the archive itself, by counting which matches carry a knockout stage label.

| Format | Competitions | What the top of the table gets |
|---|---|---|
| Four-team playoff | IPL, BBL, PSL, SA20, ILT20 | A second chance: the loser of the first qualifier drops into another qualifier instead of going out |
| Three-team playoff | WPL, The Hundred | A bye: the league leader goes straight to the final while second and third play an eliminator |

In the IPL the four qualifying teams play Qualifier 1, an Eliminator, Qualifier 2 and the Final. The top two meet in Qualifier 1, and the side that loses it does not go home — it plays Qualifier 2 against whoever survives the Eliminator. A team in the top two therefore has to lose twice to be knocked out; a team in third or fourth has to win three matches in a row.

In the WPL and The Hundred there are only two playoff matches. The leader waits in the final while second and third fight for the other place. That is a different mechanism with the same effect: the best league record is converted into fewer matches that can go wrong.

## Why we will not rank the leagues on this

It is tempting to work out which competition rewards the league stage most, and the per-league numbers do vary a lot — from The Hundred at three of four to the WPL at one of four. We are not going to present that as a finding, because the samples are far too small: the largest is the IPL at eleven tables and five of the eight leagues have four or fewer.

With four seasons, one result moves the figure by 25 percentage points. Any ranking built on that would be an artefact of how many complete tables the open archive happens to hold, not a fact about the competitions. The 40-season total is worth stating; the per-league split is not, and we would rather say so than publish a table that looks authoritative and is not.

## What this means when you look at a table in May

Three practical readings come out of the count, and none of them requires a model.

First, the race that matters most in the second half of a league stage is usually the race for second, not first. The difference between finishing first and second has been worth almost nothing historically; the difference between second and third has been worth almost everything.

Second, points alone can hide how close a table is. In 37 of our 40 tables at least two clubs finished level on points, so the order you are reading is frequently decided by net run rate rather than results. Our guide to [how net run rate works](/guides/how-net-run-rate-works) sets out the arithmetic, and it is worth knowing which side of a tiebreak your team is on.

Third, a leader with a weak net run rate is a real warning sign, not a curiosity. Gujarat Lions topped the 2016 IPL with a negative figure and did not reach the final. It is one case, so it proves nothing on its own — but it is a reminder that points count wins while net run rate counts margins, and only one of the two says anything about how the wins were earned.

## How we counted

We use only seasons where we hold a complete league table, which means every league match is in the record with no gaps in the fixture numbers and every club has played the same number of games. One missing match moves both the points and the net run rate, so a partial table cannot be used for this at all. That gives 40 tables and 286 team-seasons across eight competitions; the seasons we could not use are listed on each [league hub](/leagues) with the reason.

"Champion" is the winner of the match the archive marks as the final. "Finished first" means first in the league table as we compute it, after the league stage and before any playoff. Where clubs were level on points we order them by net run rate, which is the standard tiebreak in every competition here.

One limitation to state plainly: 40 tables is not a large sample for a question like this, and the seasons are not independent of each other — the same strong clubs recur. The 85% figure is a description of what has happened in the seasons we can read, not a probability for next season.

## Where the numbers come from

Every table is computed by us from the open [Cricsheet](https://cricsheet.org/) archive, published under the Open Data Commons Attribution License 1.0. We parse the ball-by-ball files, count runs and overs for and against each club, and build the standings ourselves; the playoff structures in this article come from the stage labels on the matches in the same files.

Season results and official standings can be checked against the competitions' own sites and the match archives at [ESPNcricinfo](https://www.espncricinfo.com/).

## Questions people ask

### Does finishing top of the points table mean you win the title?

Not usually. Across 40 complete league tables the leader went on to win 18 times, which is 45%. Finishing in the top two is the stronger signal: those sides have won 34 of the 40.

### What is the lowest position a champion has finished in the league stage?

Fourth, and it has happened twice — Sunrisers Hyderabad in the 2016 IPL and Lahore Qalandars in the 2025 PSL. No champion in our records has come from fifth or lower.

### Why do teams in the top two have an advantage in the playoffs?

In a four-team playoff the top two meet first and the loser gets a second chance in another qualifier rather than going out. In a three-team playoff the leader skips straight to the final. Both formats mean the top of the table has fewer matches that can go wrong.

### Has a team ever topped the table with a negative net run rate?

Once in our records: Gujarat Lions led the 2016 IPL on 18 points with a net run rate of −0.374. They did not win the title; Sunrisers Hyderabad did, from fourth.

### How often does net run rate decide a team's position?

Very often. In 37 of our 40 tables at least two clubs finished level on points, so the tiebreak was doing real work in almost every season we hold.

## More from blog

- [PSL Winners List: Every Champion from 2016 to 2026](/blog/psl-winners)
- [SA20 Winners: Every Champion from 2023 to 2026](/blog/sa20-winners)
- [T20 World Cup Winners: Every Champion from 2007 to 2026](/blog/t20-world-cup-winners)
- [The Hundred Winners: Every Champion from 2021 to 2026](/blog/the-hundred-winners)
- [What the Aviator Game Is and How a Round Is Played](/blog/what-is-aviator-game)
- [WPL Winners List: Every Champion from 2023 to 2026](/blog/wpl-winners)
- [Best and Worst Net Run Rates in 286 Team Seasons](/blog/best-and-worst-nrr-seasons)
- [BBL Winners List: Every Big Bash Champion from 2011 to 2026](/blog/big-bash-league-winners)
- [CPL Winners: Every Champion from 2013 to 2025](/blog/cpl-winners)
- [How Pitch Conditions Change a Cricket Match](/guides/how-pitch-conditions-work)
- [How to Spot a Fake Cricket App](/guides/how-to-spot-a-fake-cricket-app)
- [Caribbean Premier League 2026 — live schedule and table](/leagues/cpl)